Post by vfourmax on Jun 2, 2010 20:22:37 GMT -5
I see where with the starting rosters there are,
3-WR
1-TE/WR
1 UT- WR-RB-TE
With that set up you could actually start as many as 5 Wide Recievers.
Would perhaps setting the WR starting position to be 2 instead of 3 so that a maximum of 4 WR could be on the field at any given time be more to the constraints of an actual football team.
I do not forsee many instances where a person would actually have two stud TE and would start them over one tight end and a decent WR.
Granted the UT player could well be a running back but even then you would be able to still utilize three WR and 3 RB or 4WR and 2RB or use a second TE in that slot.
Still leaves a lot of versatility without overloading one position quite as much.
Just something you may want to possibly consider.
3-WR
1-TE/WR
1 UT- WR-RB-TE
With that set up you could actually start as many as 5 Wide Recievers.
Would perhaps setting the WR starting position to be 2 instead of 3 so that a maximum of 4 WR could be on the field at any given time be more to the constraints of an actual football team.
I do not forsee many instances where a person would actually have two stud TE and would start them over one tight end and a decent WR.
Granted the UT player could well be a running back but even then you would be able to still utilize three WR and 3 RB or 4WR and 2RB or use a second TE in that slot.
Still leaves a lot of versatility without overloading one position quite as much.
Just something you may want to possibly consider.
